Archive

Author Archive

Midweek Round-up

April 1st, 2009 7:48 pm
Stephen Colbert and Glenn Beck

Stephen Colbert and Glenn Beck

To use one of Dan Rather’s signature quotations:  Scott Murphy’s lead is “as thin as turnip soup” in the NY-20 special congressional election.

Fortunately, Murphy, the Democratic candidate, has a big (Republican) family to support him (57 immediate family members!).

Tedisco, the Republican challenger, holds out hope in the 10,000 absentee ballots, but it doesn’t look good for national Republicans.

Obama hits London for the G-20 summit — bearing gifts!

Eric Holder, the attorney general, lets former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens off the hook but keeps a tighter leash on the DOJ on the subject of DC voting rights.

Maybe the stimulus is starting to work?  I’ll leave the details to our colleagues at The Bottom Line.

And Steven Colbert calls out Glenn Beck for being an idiot.

Uncategorized , , , ,

Sly Fox

March 30th, 2009 10:14 pm

nation-logoJust when you thought it wasn’t possible, Fox News has just become even more fair and balanced!

That’s right. This morning, Fox News debuted the Fox Nation, an opinion (what’s the difference, right?) website geared towards channeling such personalities as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck. Brilliant! I thought Fox had peaked when lone liberal Alan Colmes left Hannity and Colmes, leaving only Hannity to carry on a one-man show. But, no! Fox managed to outperform itself and create a haven of open discussion and fairness.

Here’s Grover Norquist, founder and president of Americans for Tax Reform (a conservative policy group), writing for Fox News Blog:

“Just as FOX News brought a new vision and voice to the media landscape in the 90s–fair and balanced reporting, plus strong debate and commentary—so FOX Nation will bring still more vision and voice in the decade to come.”

I’m so excited I’m shaking. Read more…

Uncategorized , ,

Bartlet for EFCA

March 27th, 2009 3:54 pm
Martin Sheen as President Jed Bartlet

Martin Sheen is totally still the president.

The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room reported today that actors Martin Sheen, Richard Schiff, and Bradley Whitford from the 1999-2006 NBC show The West Wing will be up on Capitol Hill pushing the Employee Free Choice Act this Tuesday.  Sheen, who played President Josiah Bartlet, Schiff, who played Communications Director Toby Ziegler, and Whitford, who played Deputy Chief of Staff Josh Lyman, will meet with actual Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy to promote the legislation.  It’s being organized by various labor groups. Read more…

Uncategorized ,

Labor Pains

March 26th, 2009 11:52 am

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

As I speculated in an earlier post, the Employee Free Choice Act, perhaps the biggest part of organized labor’s agenda this year, should be seen as a critical indicator of Sen. Arlen Specter’s reelection plans.  And indeed, it is exactly that.  Yesterday, Specter, calling himself “the decisive vote,” came out against EFCA and stated that he will not be the 60th Senate vote in favor of its passage.  Thus, he will allow Republicans to proceed with a filibuster on the divisive legislation if they see fit (and they will).

But the legislation is not nearly as important as the political smoke-signal it sends.  Specter is facing a tough Republican primary challenge from conservative former U.S. Rep. Pat Toomey.  Toomey, who’s trying to rehash a 2004 primary in which he lost to Specter by only 2 percent, sought to join the race after Specter voted for the Democratic stimulus package in January.

Toomey’s decision to attack Specter from the Right comes just as Quinnipiac University and Franklin and Marshall College release two separate polls on Wednesday on the 2010 primary battle.  Quinnipiac, which I personally trust more, put Toomey ahead of Specter, 41-27.  F&M had Specter ahead, 33-18, but identified 42 percent of Republicans as undecided voters. Read more…

Uncategorized , ,

Volcano Insurance

March 23rd, 2009 4:35 pm
mountredoubteruption

Mount Redoubt in Alaska erupting in 1990

In the Fox series Family Guy, Peter Griffin is mocked by his wife for buying volcano insurance from a greasy salesman.  For those of you who don’t know, Family Guy centers around life in Quahog, Rhode Island—hardly the center of volcanic activity and definitely not in the Ring of Fire.

However, real life volcano insurance is no joke.  Last month, the governor of Louisiana, and possible 2012 Republican presidential hopeful, Bobby Jindal similarly mocked the earmarked appropriation for Alaskan volcano monitoring equipment:

[Congressional stimulus] legislation is larded with wasteful spending. It includes $300 million to buy new cars for the government, $8 billion for high-speed rail projects, such as a ‘magnetic levitation’ line from Las Vegas to Disneyland, and $140 million for something called ‘volcano monitoring.’ Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington, D.C.

Clever, Bobby.  But you missed an important factor is your tirade against government spending, per Talking Points Memo: volcanoes actually erupt.  That’s right.  Mount Redoubt, located near Anchorage, Alaska, started erupting last night.  Now, I’m not saying this monitoring equipment should have been included in the stimulus bill.  It shouldn’t have been.  Nor am I saying this earmark could have helped somehow stopped the volcano from erupting.  Funding for the monitoring equipment, based on the reports I’ve seen, hasn’t even moved forward yet.  But Jindal’s point, as a proponent of limited-government, is that this equipment is unnecessary and is an example of government spending run amok.  (Forget that this was an earmark from Alaska’s Republican congressman Don Young.)  And that’s disingenuous to the practical benefits of earmarks proposals.

Recently, some Republicans, mostly those with 2012 ambitions, have criticized government spending, and have even opted to refuse it.   But as they are learning quickly, it’s hard to talk-the-talk and walk-the-walk.  Most are not agreeing to accept it, despite the ruckus. Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has said she doesn’t want the stimulus money without open public debate; in other words, she wants the best of both worlds.  Palin wants to get the money to fund her state, while opposing it politically.

Certainly, there are plenty of wasteful projects from the government.  But not every earmark specified to a particular region for a particular cause is wasteful.  Quite the contrary, many earmarks provide needed funding for projects communities need.  And Republicans are going to lose this battle if they seek it.

Here’s a Zen-like reminder from former Clinton aide, now ABC journalist, George Stephanopoulos in his book:

“I don’t think government is good, just necessary.”

Uncategorized , , ,

Barack Obama: The Fonz of Our Time?

March 20th, 2009 8:17 pm

We all know President Barack Obama prides himself on his “cool” factor—he’s a fresh-faced politician who connects with younger Americans in a striking way.  From playing basketball to his laid-back vernacular, Obama is certainly different from other American presidents, and this separation has been responsible for a plethora of comparisons to President John F. Kennedy.  And practically speaking, Obama has harnessed this youthful charisma to sell his political policies to the American people.

Obama’s communication skills, after a week of problems, were in high-gear last night as I watched him on NBC’s The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, where he covered everything from his NCAA bracket (Go Sooners!) to his fiscal budget, from the AIG scandal to American Idol.

My initial reaction was how revolutionary (and genius) the appearance was.  Here’s the President of the United States selling his policies to a TV audience of regular people who, after a long day of work, are probably just watching late-night comedy—and not the news.  Thus, Obama gets a fresh opportunity to win over support for his policies with the friendly, soft-ball questioning of Jay Leno: political gold with none of the pushback of political commentators.

I kept watching.  AIG Bonuses?  Bad.  Battery and hydrogen car technology?  Good.  And I thought, “Wow, this guy is really connecting with his audience.  It’s like Bill Clinton on the Arsenio Hall Show in 1992.”

And then Leno asked this knocker: “How cool is it to fly on Air Force Once?”
And Obama’s response: “Now, let me tell you, I personally think it’s pretty cool. Especially because they give you, you know, the jacket with the seal on it.”

That’s when I became a little disgusted.  It was great for the President to sell his policies in “campaign-mode” in California, and even to appear on a popular show to connect to a larger audience.  But put yourself in the shoes of a laid-off worker in Akron, Ohio, unable to support his family and waiting for the President to turn things around.  Now re-read the final half of Obama’s interview.  Personally, I’d be wondering where this guy gets off laughing it up with Leno in Hollywood when I’m struggling to pay the bills.  I’d feel mocked.

And that’s the fine line between appearing friendly and appearing aloof.  Obama has all the moves of Happy Days cool-guy Arthur Fonzarelli, but this isn’t a personality contest.  It’s the future of the country.  I’m confident Obama knows the difference, but he needs to be careful about how, and over what media, he channels his inner-guy-next-door.

What do you think?  Is Obama too cool for school?  Or the smartest kid in school?  Maybe it’s a little bit of both.

Uncategorized

The Specter of 2010

March 17th, 2009 11:26 pm

arlen_spMerriam-Webster defines a “specter” as “something that haunts or perturbs the mind.” And over the next two years, the reelection of Arlen Specter, the senior senator from Pennsylvania, will haunt the corridors of Capitol Hill. That’s because Specter, running for his sixth term in 2010, qualifies as a prime target for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the political organizing arm of the Democratic Party responsible for getting Democrats elected to the U.S. Senate.

During the Obama-Clinton April 2008 primary and the Obama-McCain general election, the Democratic share of the Pennsylvania electorate sky-rocketed. According to the Pennsylvania Department of State, Democrats increased their numerical advantage over Republicans in the state from 580,208 in 2004 to 1,237,300 in 2008. Likewise, the Democratic share of total registered voters in the state changed from 48 percent to 51 percent, respectively. For this reason alone, Specter is due for a tough campaign.

But before Democrats rejoice at the possibility of another moderate Republican biting the dust, it’s important to factor in the nuanced challenges Specter will face, and how he could avoid losing. On the blog FiveThirtyEight.com, Nate Silver has factored Pennsylvania as the number one pick-up opportunity in 2010. Silver’s argument is based on the likelihood of a number of factors, among them Specter switching parties, losing the Republican nomination to a conservative, refusing to run again (he’ll be 80 years old on election day), and just, plain losing to a Democrat. Read more…

Uncategorized , , , ,

Turning the District into a District

March 16th, 2009 2:40 pm

washdcplateAs anyone who has traveled to Washington, D.C., and can read a license plate can tell you, the District of Columbia is a bastion of taxation without representation.

Constitutionally deprived of a voting representative in the House of Representatives (not to mention the Senate), D.C. voting rights has been an on-going shadow issue for decades among residents. The issue hinges on constitutional and legal constraints, balance in Congress and the lack of political will. Ironically, the city that hosts the country’s politicians has had a very hard time getting leaders to act on the issue. But in recent weeks, an unlikely ally has come to aid the District in its fight: Utah.

How, you might ask, does Utah fit into the politics of voting rights in Washington? According to the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, Congress has the right to regulate the District directly. As such, D.C. voting rights are subject to national political concerns, and competing constituency expectations. For Republicans, it would be inconceivable to give a seat in Congress to a heavily Democratic district with no strings attached (although that would obviously be the just thing to do). For Republicans to agree to a Democratic representative from the District, they would need a new Republican district to strike a balance. And where could a reliable Republican district be placed? Utah! Read more…

Uncategorized , ,